| |
Sorry, but
Securities Traders were generally not able to use the
Mark-to-Market method before 1997.
Special situation
for a taxpayer's initial tax return
|
All the aforementioned election filing
deadlines pertain to individual taxpayers who were required to file and who
actually did file at least one tax return prior to making the
Mark-to-Market election. For those taxpayers who are filing their
first ever tax return, no filing deadlines for a timely
mark-to-market election have been established, other than that the
election statement (as previously described) be placed in its books and
records immediately in the first year and that a copy also be attached
to the first original federal income tax return filed. Typically
this pertains to taxpaying entities other than individuals, such as a
newly formed corporation or LLC. Click
here for more on this sophisticated option. Click
here to form your entity right away.
TIP: If you are a trader who
timely filed a M2M election and you incurred huge
losses in the stock market during 2007, here's a tip - rather than using the
resulting Net Operating Loss (NOL) as a 2-year
carryback (formerly a 5-year carryback), consider
a timely filed NOL election to carry it forward only. Then
convert a portion (or all) of your retirement plans & traditional IRAs to
tax-free Roth IRAs, using the NOL carryforward to shelter the
taxes currently due on the conversion. We can prepare the
appropriate elections for you to file. Become
a client here to discuss what plan of action is advisable for you.
By doing this your heretofore full taxable retirement plans &
traditional IRAs will become non-taxable for income tax purposes. All
future year's growth will then be income tax free, where the
growth was only income tax deferred before converting to a
Roth.
-
Net Operating Losses (NOLs)
generally can be used to offset other taxable income in prior years
and in future years. Individuals need to decide at the time that they file
their form 1040 (if it shows a current year NOL) whether they want to carry forward
the loss to offset future taxable income, or to carry the loss back
two years or back five years and recoup taxes paid, plus
occasionally even some interest on
the money! (see discussion below about interest payments). The odds of an audit are much higher when an
individual trader's NOL carry back is filed using form 1045 or 1040X.
But if all your ducks are in a row, the result is a refund of taxes
paid at your higher tax brackets from 2000 or 1997 for a loss incurred
during 2002 (for example). Or refunded from 2003 for a loss
incurred during 2005, as another example
Optionally an election may be filed with a timely filed 2005 form 1040
to carry forward the NOL, rather than going back for refunds.
The odds of audit when taking this approach are far less because there is
no manual examination of the forms 1045 and 1040X along with your
prior year 1040s. A trader might decide to carry forward
if he was in low tax brackets in prior years, expects to be in higher
tax brackets in future years, or if there are significant skeletons in
the closet with his prior returns. There is no sense of
potentially opening a can-of-worms looking for a refund of prior year
taxes if the prospects of going forward are more advantageous.
Another detriment of carrying back is that on the way back the
taxpayer often forfeits many deductions, credits and exemptions that
he originally was entitled to, thereby reducing the net benefit of the
deductible NOL.
In summary, when an individual trader's tax year 2002 M2M losses are
large enough to create a NOL he must first decide whether to carry
back or to carry forward the loss. If he elects to carry back,
he must then decide to carry back two years to 2000 or five years to
1997. In all three of these cases if the year the NOL is
carried to does not fully use up the NOL amount, then the remaining
unused portion of the NOL is carried forward to be applied year-by-year.
Update: On November 20, 2003 House Lawmakers voted to revive the five-year
NOL carryback, which was set to expire.
House taxwriters Jerry Weller, R-Ill., Dave Camp, R-Mich., Jim
Ramstad, R-Minn., Kevin Brady, R-Texas, Phil English, R-Pa., Scott
McInnis, R-Colo., and Philip M. Crane, R-Ill., linked the NOL
provision to a recent economic resurgence.
The refunds that resulted from these NOL carrybacks were used to hire
and retain workers and to make capital investments that provided
stimulus to the economy," the taxwriters wrote Thomas in a November 17
letter.
Further Update: The five-year NOL carryback
has expired. It only applies for net
operating losses for taxable years ending during 2001 or 2002.
Update: January 2008.
Congress is planning for a five year carryback provision again - for
2007 & 2008.
Update: April 2008.
Congress is planning for a four year carryback provision - for
2008 & 2009.
Interest Payments made by IRS on the NOL
refund amount:
NOLs generally are not entitled to any interest paid on the refunded
amount. There are two situations where interest is paid:
-
If the NOL processing is delayed so that your refund check is sent
out later than what the IRS considers timely (usually three months
or so) then the taxpayer is entitled to interest which can be
computed from the date your NOL refund request was received by IRS,
or the date the refund check "should" have been mail to you,
depending on how the IRS clerk understands the rules.
-
The IRS, unbelievably, has exceeding poor quality control over this
area. It has been reported anonymous to us by some taxpayers
that the IRS has paid substantial interest, retroactively, from the
due date of the original tax return from which the refund amount is
coming from.
Conscientious taxpayers inform the IRS of the possible error and
occasionally the IRS understands and takes back the interest by
voiding the original and then reissuing the check. Other times
the IRS appears to be clueless about the concept of when interest is
supposed to be paid to a taxpayer. [Caution
- if sending back the original IRS check, many taxpayers find
themselves in a deep dark IRS black hole and if takes months or
years to get their money. So an alternative to consider is to
cash the IRS check and repay with a personal check] [Caution
#2 - cashing an IRS check for a greater amount than you are
entitled to, potentially subjects the taxpayer to penalties and
interest on the excess funds deposited.]
Therefore when obtaining a NOL refund, sometimes substantial
interest is included, and sometimes a small insignificant amount of
interest is included and sometimes interest is not included at all.
For information on similar problems when the
IRS is charging interest, go to
this link:
http://traderstatus.com/IRSinterest.htm
"Retroactive"
Mark-to-Market Elections
|
Individuals who want to use Mark-to-Market accounting for their
trading generally must elect to do so on form 1040 or extension form
4868 no later than April 15th. Having missed this date means
that you must wait until next year.
But there are some "retroactive" M2M elections that can be useful if
made with professional assistance:
-
Traders who have an entity newly established1
at the early part of
the year in which the losses were incurred may have elected M2M under the special rules for 1st
time tax return filers without ever realizing it could benefit them
now.
-
Traders who did not have a large capital loss last year, may not
really need M2M in that year and therefore they can elect this year
before April 15th or, if after April 15th they
can form an appropriate new entity to trade through and make a
special M2M election immediately upon formation.
- Traders who lost trading
during the year, but who's losses were merely "paper losses" because
they were still holding the positions with significant paper losses
in them on December 31 can make a special "retroactive election"
to use those losses, if done before April 15 of the following year.
- Similarly, traders who
bought back securities within 30 days from when they sold them at
significant losses in violation of the Wash Sales Rule, may make a
special "retroactive election" on those losses, if done before April
15 of the following year.
- After the April 15th
deadline this Wash Sales Rule play coupled with a newly established
entity may be helpful.
- The Wash Sale Rule plays
above can be "forced" by making sure you violate the rule by
buying back the same securities within 30 days of a sale that
resulted in significant tax losses. Don't let the thirty days
pass by without taking appropriate action.
1
If you own a newly formed entity such as an S-Corp, LLC, Partnership,
Joint Venture, Joint Account and Certain Joint Undertakings with a
Fellow Trader or Family Member and have never filed an income tax
return together, or if other special circumstances apply, then you
should
contact us
to discuss your options regarding a so-called "retroactive" M2M application.
When writing, please answer these questions which might indicate if
you qualify for M2M even without a separate entity formed with the
Secretary of the State.:
- When, what date, was the
brokerage account open?
- When, what date, was the
brokerage account funded?
- What name(s) are on the
account?
- Are you married? and neither
of you have filed for a tax return for the year in question?
- What did you trade?
securities/stock options? futures/commodities? forex?
- What was the bottom line gain
or loss for the year?
"Retroactive"
Capital Loss Carryback Elections
|
A Carryback of IRS Code §1256
Losses to offset Prior IRS Code §1256 Gains, while normally elected
with the timely filing of the tax return for the year that the loss
was created, may nonetheless be carryied back retroactively in many
cases.
This retoractive carryback election applies to Traders as well as to
Investors for their IRS Code §1256 Commodities and Futures capital
losses. Generally this must be retroactively elected within the
three year statute of limitations for either the loss year and/or the
carryback year(s).
Normally the regular carryback election is made by checking Box D on
form 6781 on a timely filed Income tax return.
Additional
informational overview sites
|
Making
the Mark-to-Market Election - Part I
Making
the Mark-to-Market Election - Part II
The
Section 481(a) Adjustment
|