Nominee - Agency | |||
Home Order more Information |
Alter-Ego | ||
|
Copyright© 2005 to 2011 Colin M. Cody, CPA and TraderStatus.com, LLC, All Rights Reserved. | |
DISCLAIMER
|
Internal Revenue Manual (IRM)
|
---|
5.12.1.2.11
Nominee
and
Alter-Ego
Situations
(12-01-2006)
Persons
identified
as
nominees
or
alter
egos
are
not
entitled
to a
Collection
Due
Process
Hearing.
If a
nominee
or
alter
ego
is
sent
Letter
3177,
Notice
of
Federal
Tax
Lien
Filing
"Nominee
and
Alter
Ego"
there
is
no
requirement
to
send
this
notice
certified
mail.
The
person
identified
as a
nominee
or
alter
ego
may
use
the
appeal
process
under
the
Collection
Appeals
Program
(CAP).
The
taxpayer
is
entitled
to
CDP
rights
under
IRC
§6320.
Persons identified as nominees or alter-egos are not entitled to a Collection Due Process hearing. CDP hearings are only available to delinquent taxpayers. Remember to send these lien requests to Collection Advisory for review. Advisory will forward the lien request to Counsel for approval.
Prior to requesting the POA notification, revenue officers must prepare the Form 668(Y)(c). Scan the document into a PDF file and secure e-mail it and any attachments to the CLU. If scanning is not an option, mail the NFTL and any attachments to the lien unit. CLU will complete the billing and issuance process.
Send Letter 3177, Notice of Federal Tax Lien Filing - Nominee and Alter-Ego to individuals identified as nominees or alter egos, with a copy of the lien. Certified mailing is not required. See IRM 5.12.2.
The person identified as the nominee or alter-ego may appeal under the Collection Appeals Program (CAP) process.
The taxpayer (transferor) is entitled to CDP rights under IRC 6320.
Example: John Smith owned property at 1111 Blackstone Park, Anywhere, MD. Mr. Smith has a tax liability. The collection information statement shows no assets. However, research shows he sold property to Jane Smith, his daughter, for a nominal amount. Mr. Smith uses the property as collateral for loans, pays the mortgage, maintains the property, makes repairs and improvements, etc. A NFTL is not filed. Follow-up actions show that Mr. Smith displays ownership. Even though the property is titled to Ms. Smith, Mr. Smith is the beneficial owner. Counsel recommends that a nominee lien be filed against Jane Smith as the nominee for John Smith.
The taxpayer (transferor), in this situation, must receive the right to a hearing notice. In most instances the taxpayer would have received CDP rights (L3172) under IRC 6320 when a NFTL was filed in the taxpayer's name. Research ALS before issuing the notice.
If necessary, issue L3886, Notice to Taxpayer of Nominee/Alter Ego Federal Tax Lien Filing and Your Rights to a Hearing Under IRC 6320, only if the taxpayer has not received appeal rights (issued L3172) for the identified tax periods.ALS will not generate L3886. Employees assigned the case must ensure the response due date is calculated and the notice is sent certified mail within the required five business day mailing period.
Document the notice mailing in the case file history.
Retain the date stamped receipted copy of the certified mail label. See IRM 5.12.6.4.7 for additional retention information.
Check with your recording official. Some recording offices allow the submission of Form 3982, Billing Support Voucher for Liens and Certificate Fees, for fee payment. The recording office will add the fee to the monthly invoice submitted to CLU for payment.
5.12.2.6.5 Preparing Nominee Liens (02-01-2007)
A nominee is someone who is designated to act for
another. As used in the
federal tax lien context, a nominee is generally a third person who
holds legal title to property of the taxpayer while the taxpayer
enjoys full use and benefit of the property.
The FTL extends to property actually owned by the taxpayer
even though a third party owns legal title.
The third person can be any person listed in IRC §7701(a)(1).
The nominee situation normally involves a
fraudulent conveyance or transfer of a taxpayer’s property to avoid
legal obligations. To
establish a nominee lien situation, it must be shown that while a
third party may have legal title to the property, it is the taxpayer
that owns the property and who enjoys the full use and benefits.
Request area counsel advice before filing a
nominee lien. Consider
the following circumstances when developing your case:
The taxpayer is paying maintenance expenses.
The taxpayer is using the property as collateral
for a loan.
The taxpayer is paying state and local taxes on
the property.
Other use or benefit from the property.
Other relevant facts.
You may not file a nominee lien without the
written approval of area counsel…
In determining what additional enforcement action
should be taken, consideration must be given to the confusion in the
chain of title and redemption rights of the taxpayer.
These conditions may depress the sale of the property.
A judicial lien, foreclosure or seizure followed
by suit to foreclose the NFTL will generally bring a greater sale
price, particularly for real property.
The administrative seizure and sale process may be
used if prompt action is needed to protect the government’s
interest. If there is
any doubt, request an opinion from area counsel.
5.12.2.6.5 Preparing Nominee Liens (10-30-2009)
Requirements for processing
nominee or other special liens are found in IRM
5.12.2.6.4.
A nominee is someone designated to
act for another. As used in the federal tax lien
context, a nominee is generally a third person who
holds legal title to property of a taxpayer while
the taxpayer enjoys full use and benefit of that
property. The FTL extends to property actually owned
by the taxpayer even though a third person holds
legal title. The third person can be any person
listed in IRC 7701 (a) (1).
See IRM 5.12.1.2.11 for procedures for issuing
nominee collection due processing notices.
A nominee situation normally
involves a fraudulent conveyance or transfer of a
taxpayer’s property to avoid legal obligations. To
establish a nominee lien situation, it must be shown
that while a third party may have legal title to the
property, it is the taxpayer that owns the property
and who enjoys the full use and benefits.
Request Area Counsel advice before
filing a nominee lien. Consider the following
circumstances when developing your case:
the taxpayer is
paying maintenance expenses,
the taxpayer is
using the property as collateral for
loans,
the taxpayer is
paying state and local taxes on the
property,
the taxpayer has
the use or benefit from the property
other relevant
facts. See also IRM 5.17.2.5.7.2(2)
Cases should be
developed to withstand court
challenge (with minimal additional
development).
Focus should be
for advice as to the need for a
supplemental assessment, a new
notice and demand and the language
to be incorporated in the NFTL.
Prepare a report
containing all of the facts of the
case to accompany the request.
Request Area
Counsel direction regarding
enforcement of the lien.
Subsequent enforcement action is
at the Area Office’s discretion once Area Counsel
has approved application of the nominee theory in
writing.
In determining what additional
enforcement action should be taken, consideration
must be given to the confusion in the chain of title
and redemption rights of the taxpayer. These
conditions may depress the sale of the property.
A judicial lien foreclosure or
seizure followed by suit to foreclose the NFTL will
generally bring a greater sale price particularly
for real property.
The administrative seizure and
sale process may be used if prompt action is needed
to protect the governments' interest. If there is
any doubt, request an opinion from Area Counsel.
See IRM 5.17.2, Federal Tax Liens, for additional information.
5.12.2.6.6 Determining When a Nominee Lien is Required
(02-01-2007)
Under certain circumstances, a statutory lien
continues to attach to transferred property, even though a NFTL was
not filed at the time of transfer.
For example,
The taxpayer (transferrer)(sic) transfers property
to a party (transferee) and does not receive adequate and full
consideration in money or moneys worth.
The transferee is not considered a purchaser.
See §6323(h)(6)…
If NFTL is filed in the name of the taxpayer
before the transferee encumbers or sells the property to a valid
purchaser, the government’s lien interest is fully protected.
In these circumstances, the lien can be enforced by the seizure of the property from the transfer or subsequent valid purchaser, or by a suit to foreclose the lien.
A nominee lien or a “specific property” lien filed
in the name of the taxpayer and specifically describing the
transferred property is not required to protect the government’s
interest when these conditions are met.
Such liens should not be recorded.
The taxpayer may record fraudulent transfer
documents that make it appear as if the transfer of their property
was to a valid person prior to the filing of the NFTL.
For example, the taxpayer may record a warranty deed showing
the transferee paid fair market value for the property instead of a
quick(sic) quit-claim deed for a love and affection.
In these circumstances, consider filing:
A nominee lien (if the transfer was in name only),
or
A transferee lien (if the taxpayer gave title and
use and control of the property to the transferee, although no
consideration was received.
5.12.2.6.6 Determining When a Nominee Lien iis Required
(10-30-2009)
Requirements for processing
nominee or other special liens are found in IRM
5.12.2.6.4.
Under certain circumstances a
statutory lien continues to attach to transferred
property even though a NFTL was not filed at the
time of transfer. For example,
The taxpayer (transferor) transfers property to a party (transferee) and does not receive adequate and full consideration in money or money's worth. The transferee is not considered a purchaser. See IRC 6323(h)(6) for a more complete definition of purchaser
If a NFTL is filed
in the name of the taxpayer before
the transferee encumbers or sells
the property to a valid purchaser,
the government's lien interest is
fully perfected.
In these
circumstances, the lien can be
enforced by a seizure of the
property from the transferee or
subsequent valid purchaser, or by a
suit to foreclose the lien.
A nominee lien or a "specific
property" lien filed in the name of the taxpayer and
specifically describing the transferred property is
not required to protect the government's interest
when these conditions are met. Such liens should not
be recorded.
The taxpayer may record fraudulent
transfer documents that make it appear as if the
transfer of the property was to a valid purchaser
prior to the filing of the NFTL. For example, the
taxpayer may record a warranty deed showing the
transferee paid fair market value for the property
instead of a quit-claim deed for love and affection.
In these circumstances consider filing:
a nominee lien (if
the transfer was in name only), or
a transferee lien
(if the taxpayer gave title and use
and control of the property to the
transferee although no consideration
was received).
Minnie College owes $70,000 for
tax periods 199912 and 20012. Minnie deeds property
valued at $150,000 to her daughter, Molly for no
cost. Minnie continues to maintain the property and
uses it as collateral for obtaining a car. Molly
lives on the property. Molly is a nominee for Minnie
because consideration was not received for the
property.
William and Mary Black give a
$600,000 home to their son Bob. William and Mary,
have outstanding tax liabilities and state they have
no property and cannot pay their liability. Bob
maintains the property, the deed is in his name and
he refinanced the home. Bob is the transferee in
this case. Bob did not pay for the home. Bob also
uses the home for collateral.
5.12.2.6.7 Alter Ego Liens (02-01-2007)
The “alter ego” (second self) doctrine has been
summarized as follows: the obligation of a corporation will be
recognized as those of another person and vice versa, where it
appears that the corporation is not only influenced and governed by
that person, but there is such a unity of interest and ownership
that the individual reality or separateness of the person and the
corporation has ceased.
Also the facts are such that adherence to the fiction of the
separate existence of the corporation would, under the particular
circumstances, sanction of fraud or promote injustice.”
There are two elements to the alter ego doctrine:
Unity of ownership and interests,
Fraud or inequity would result in
the failure to disregard corporate entity.
Some factors pertinent to a
determination to disregard the corporate entity are
whether the individual:
Is in a position
of control of authority over the
entity.
Controls the
entity to shield himself from
personal liability.
Uses the business
entity for his or her own financial
benefit.
Uses the business
entity to assume personal debts, or
debts of another.
Uses personal
funds to pay the business entity’s
debts.
Some facts established from the
factors in (3) above are:
Commingling of
funds and other assets
Failure to
segregate funds of the separate
entities
An unauthorized
diversion of corporate funds or
assets to other than corporate uses.
Treatment by an
individual of the assets of the
corporation as his or her own.
Failure to obtain
authority to issue stock or to
subscribe to or issue the same
Holding out by an
individual that he or she is
personally liable for the debts of
the corporation
Failure to
maintain minutes or adequate
corporate records, and confusion of
records of separate entities
The identical
equitable ownership in two entities
Failure to
adequately capitalize a corporation,
the total absence of corporate
assets, and undercapitalization…
Do not file a NFTL in the name of
an alter ego without legal review, advice and
written direction from area counsel…
5.12.2.6.7 Alter-Ego Liens
(10-30-2009)
Requirements for processing alter
ego or other special liens are found in IRM
5.12.2.6.4.
The "‘alter-ego’" (second self)
doctrine has been summarized as follows: The
obligation of a corporation will be recognized as
those of another person, and vice versa, where it
appears that the corporation is not only influenced
and governed by that person, but there is such a
unity of interest and ownership that the
individuality or separateness, of the person and the
corporation has ceased. Also the facts are such that
an adherence to the fiction of the separate
existence of the corporation would, under the
particular circumstances, sanction a fraud or
promote an injustice.
It is generally more difficult to establish
alter-ego relationships than a nominee situation.
There are two elements to the
alter ego doctrine:
Unity of ownership and interest,
Fraud or inequity
would result from the failure to
disregard the corporate entity.
is in a position
of control or authority over the
entity;
controls the
entity to shield himself from
personal liability;
uses the business
entity for his or her own financial
benefit;
uses the business
entity to assume personal debts, or
debts of another, or
uses personal
funds to pay the business entity’s
debts.
commingling of
funds and other assets,
failure to
segregate funds of the separate
entities,
an unauthorized
diversion of corporate funds or
assets to other than corporate uses,
treatment by an
individual of the assets of the
corporation as his own,
failure to obtain
authority to issue stock or to
subscribe to or issue the same,
holding out by an
individual that he or she is
personally liable for the debts of
the corporation,
failure to
maintain minutes or adequate
corporate records, and the confusion
of records of separate entities,
the identical equitable ownership in two entities,
the failure to
adequately capitalize a corporation,
the total absence of corporate
assets, and under capitalization,
Explore the possibility of using
the administrative process of jeopardy, transferee
assessment, nominee lien, emergency lien foreclosure
action, or emergency transferee or fraudulent
conveyance suit before filing a NFTL in the name of
an alter-ego.
Do not file a NFTL in the name of
an alter-ego without legal review, advice, and
written direction from Area Counsel as to:
the need for a
supplemental assessment,
a new notice and
demand, and
the language to be
incorporated in the NFTL.
Refer to the Legal Reference Guide
for Revenue Officers, 5.17, for additional
information.
5.12.2.6.8 Transferee Liens (03-01-2004)
There are two methods the government can use to
collect an unpaid tax liability where a taxpayer has transferred
property to a third party prior to or after the assessment of the
tax. Collection of the
tax is based on finding that the transfer was a fraudulent
conveyance…
The first method, a suit to set aside a fraudulent
conveyance, the government collects the transferrer’s(sic)
transferor's tax from the
transferred property. This is done by filing a civil action in U.S. Court.
See IRM 5.17.14.1.
The second method is administratively imposing
transfer liability, which results in the imposition of personal
liability for the tax on a third party.
The liability is then collected from the third party’s
property. To do this,
the Commissioner may issue the notice of transferred liability to
the transferee. If a Tax
Court petition is not filed or the liability is sustained by the Tax
Court, The Commissioner may assess the tax against the transferee
under the authority of IRC §6901.
Once the assessment is made, a Notice of Demand
and Payment is issued and if the transferee does not pay, a NFPL may
be issued…
Contact local counsel for authorization before
issuing a transferee lien.
5.12.2.6.8 Transferee Liens (10-30-2009)
Requirements for processing
transferee or other special liens are found in IRM
5.12.2.6.4.
There are two methods the
government can use to collect an unpaid tax
liability where a taxpayer (the transferor) has
transferred property to a third party (the
transferee) prior to or after the assessment of the
tax. Collection of the tax is based on finding that
the transfer was a fraudulent conveyance. However,
liability may arise under contract, various federal
liability statutes or state statutes governing bulk
sales, corporate dissolutions, and corporate
reorganizations.
The second method
is administratively imposing
transferee liability, which results
in the imposition of personal
liability for a tax on a third
party. The liability is then
collected from the third party’s
property. To do this, the
Commissioner mails a notice of
transferee liability to the
transferee, then, if a tax court
petition is not filed or the
liability is sustained by the Tax
Court, assesses the tax against the
transferee under the authority of
IRC 6901.
Once the
assessment is made, a notice of
demand and payment is issued, and if
the transferee does not pay, a NFTL
may be issued.
The application of payments
between the transferee and
transferor is similar in concept to
the cross referencing done with
Trust Fund Recovery penalty
collections. However, there are no
cross-reference transaction codes to
cross apply funds. So, even though
these accounts are handled by
non-master file, payment
applications may not be correctly
reflected. When receiving payments
on an IRC 6901 case, work with
Counsel on their application.
You will find many of the same
issues in transferee situations that are found in
nominee and alter-ego situations. Refer to IRM
5.17.14 for additional information on fraudulent
conveyances and transferee liability.
Contact local Counsel for written authorization before issuing a transferee lien.
Last updated: January 20, 2014 visitors since January 2014TraderStatus™, TradersTaxPlan™, TradersAdvantage™, TraderStatus.com™, TradersTaxPlan.com™, TradersAdvantage.com™, DoYourOwnDaytraderTaxes™, DoYourOwnTaxes™, DoingYourOwnTaxes™, DoYourOwnDaytraderTaxes.com™, DoYourOwnTaxes.com™, DoingYourOwnTaxes.com™, DoYourTaxesOnline™, DoYourOwnTaxesOnline™, DoYourTaxesOnline.com™, and DoYourOwnTaxesOnline.com™ are trademarks and service marks of Colin M. Cody, CPA and TraderStatus.com, LLC, Trumbull Connecticut Copyright© 2005 to 2011 Colin M. Cody, CPA and TraderStatus.com, LLC, All Rights Reserved |